A Critique of Valls’ Interpretation of Just War Theory
Title: A Critique of Valls’ Interpretation of Just War Theory
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 1166 | Pages: 4 (approximately 235 words/page)
A Critique of Valls’ Interpretation of Just War Theory
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 1166 | Pages: 4 (approximately 235 words/page)
showed first 75 words of 1166 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1166 total
they must be very precise in their targeting. It can be concluded that the argument that Valls presents is sound and defensible. However it must be stated that the overwhelming majority of acts committed by nonstate groups fail to meet the stringent requirements of just war theory, especially discrimination. Finally it can be argued that most wars do not satisfy just war requirements, especially if one dismisses the morality of the principle of double effect.