Classical conditioning VS Operant conditioning
Title: Classical conditioning VS Operant conditioning
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 1133 | Pages: 4 (approximately 235 words/page)
Classical conditioning VS Operant conditioning
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 1133 | Pages: 4 (approximately 235 words/page)
INTRODUCTION
<Tab/>Learning is necessary for all animals, it helps the survival of the fittest and helps adjust to the ever-changing environment. Learning is the association between two events together. Classical conditioning and operant conditioning both work with associating events together.
Classical conditioning
<Tab/>Thanks to Ivan Pavlov, the accidental discovery of classical or 'Pavlovian conditioning' led to a whole new section of learning. Classical conditioning is
showed first 75 words of 1133 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1133 total
their reinforcement was stopped, that animal may still have a reaction to the stimulus at a much later date. Both required experiments on animals, Operant conditioning had the Skinner box built for the use of animals, and classical conditioning had Pavlov's salivating dogs.
CONCLUSION
We use classical conditioning and operant conditioning in our everyday lives. Our behaviors have been shaped by the way we react to different situations, all to survive and avoid negative outcomes.