Comparing and Contrasting two theoretical views on arousal/performance relationship in the sports context.
Title: Comparing and Contrasting two theoretical views on arousal/performance relationship in the sports context.
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 718 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
Comparing and Contrasting two theoretical views on arousal/performance relationship in the sports context.
Category: /Social Sciences/Psychology
Details: Words: 718 | Pages: 3 (approximately 235 words/page)
The two theoretical views on the relationship between arousal and performance in the sports context are the Drive theory and the Inverted-U theory but first, we define arousal and performance in sports context.
The relationship between physiological arousal and motor performance has been of interest to psychologist since the early 1900's. Research led to the development of the two theories stated above. Arousal is a requisite for optimal sport performance. It has more often been
showed first 75 words of 718 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 718 total
inverted-U theory, it would be premature to dismiss the drive approach outright and incorrect to state that the drive theory has not impact on sport psychology research. This theory added to our understanding of the relationship between learning, that is, habit strength, and arousal. The inverted-U, on the other hand, is simply concerned with arousal and performance. Second, drive theory was influential in our understanding of the relationship between the audience-induced arousal and athletic performance.