Critical Analysis of Differing Approaches in Legal Reasoning.
Title: Critical Analysis of Differing Approaches in Legal Reasoning.
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1534 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
Critical Analysis of Differing Approaches in Legal Reasoning.
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1534 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
When a judgment is made in Australian law, it is apparent that there can often be differing approaches taken when attempting to reach this judgment. There are two common views which are frequently taken in this situation, that of the activist reasoning, and that of the positivist reasoning. Each of these has the potential to introduce judge-made bias, and commonly arises from the judge's background or social origin. When considering a case, it is often
showed first 75 words of 1534 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1534 total
amp;lt;Tab/>Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v the Commonwealth (1992) 177 CLR 106
*<Tab/>Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd and others and the State of New South Wales v The Commonwealth of Australia and another (1992) 177 CLR 106
*<Tab/>Minister for the Army v Dalziel (1944) 68 CLR 261
*<Tab/>Tasmanian Dam Case (1983) 168 CLR 145
Other
*<Tab/>Dictionary.com Retrieved April 19, 2005 from www.dictionary