Research Provider you can trust
TODAY and TOMORROW!
Service Features
  • 275 words per page
  • Font: 12 point Courier New
  • Double line spacing
  • Free unlimited paper revisions
  • Free bibliography
  • Any citation style
  • No delivery charges
  • SMS alert on paper done
  • No plagiarism
  • Direct paper download
  • Original and creative work
  • Researched any subject
  • 24/7 customer support

Madison vs. Jefferson: On the Issue of Constitutional Conflict in the Federalist Papers

Title: Madison vs. Jefferson: On the Issue of Constitutional Conflict in the Federalist Papers
Category: /Law & Government/Government & Politics
Details: Words: 1381 | Pages: 5 (approximately 235 words/page)
Madison vs. Jefferson: On the Issue of Constitutional Conflict in the Federalist Papers
In the Federalist Papers, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson discuss the issue of constitutional conflict, specifically the encroachment by any one branch of the government on another. Jefferson proposes a method for resolving such a conflict between the Judicial, the Legislative, and/or the Executive branch of government. His proposal states that ``whenever any two of the three branches of government shall concur in opinion, each by the voices of two thirds of their whole …showed first 75 words of 1381 total…
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
…showed last 75 words of 1381 total…action by the other agencies. In conclusion, Jefferson's proposal is plainly overwhelmed and made impractical by Madison's many objections. However, a practical alternative to Jefferson's method for resolving constitutional conflicts was discovered through this discussion. The alternative is simple, do nothing formally, basically allow the check and balance mechanism the autonomy necessary to restore a homeostatic equilibrium. Works Cited Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison, and John Jay. The Federalist Papers. Ed. Clinton Rossiter. New York: Penguin, 2003.

Need a custom written paper?