Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement
Title: Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1554 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
Miranda v. Arizona case: How it changed law enforcement
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1554 | Pages: 6 (approximately 235 words/page)
The "Miranda rule," which makes a confession inadmissible in a criminal trial if the accused was not properly advised of his rights, has been so thoroughly integrated into the justice system that any child who watches television can recite the words: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney" Yet the 1966 Supreme Court ruling
showed first 75 words of 1554 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1554 total
a person may get away with no punishment, even if the accused confesses to the crime, if the police do not read that person his five rights and privileges that are supposed to ensure the due process of the law stated in Amendment number five in the
American constitution. The practicality of this amendment will be a lively discussed issue in future Supreme Court cases, and the Miranda case decision will continue to be questioned.