The Supreme Court and its effects on the balance of power between federal and state. (McCullogh v Maryland, Lochner v NY, Nebbia v NY) The role of Supreme Court in relation to federalism.
Title: The Supreme Court and its effects on the balance of power between federal and state. (McCullogh v Maryland, Lochner v NY, Nebbia v NY) The role of Supreme Court in relation to federalism.
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1975 | Pages: 7 (approximately 235 words/page)
The Supreme Court and its effects on the balance of power between federal and state. (McCullogh v Maryland, Lochner v NY, Nebbia v NY) The role of Supreme Court in relation to federalism.
Category: /Law & Government
Details: Words: 1975 | Pages: 7 (approximately 235 words/page)
The Supreme Court's most highly regarded responsibility is to decide cases that raise questions of constitutional interpretation. The Supreme Court has been mixed up with many legal and political scuffles concerning the proper balance of power between federal power and states rights. Federalism has been an ongoing debate and how it should be dealt with has also been questioned. Federalism is the uniting of separate states to allow for basic political honesty. Often times, it
showed first 75 words of 1975 total
You are viewing only a small portion of the paper.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
Please login or register to access the full copy.
showed last 75 words of 1975 total
look at the case alone, but view history, the majority, and past court cases on a specific case before making a decision. The justices try to make the right decision when state rights are in question. I think they do their research and decide what is right during that specific time. I give the Supreme Court the power they have. It is not a question of the balance of power. They keep the power balanced.