Torture is defined as "infliction of severe physical pain as a means of punishment or coercion." Michael Levin and Cesare Bonesana both discuss this controversial issue in their essays. Both essays present readers with complete information on the issue. However, the writing style and strategies used by Michael Levin, in "The Case for Torture," make his argument more effective and easier to follow. In determining the more effective argument, we can simply analyze the opening …showed first 75 words of 618 total…

…showed last 75 words of 618 total…the author utilizes rhetorical questions, coupled with sarcastic answers in order to make an effective argument. Accordingly, Michael Levin makes the more understandable argument when comparing his rationale in "The Case for Torture" with that of Cesare Bonesana. Usage of rhetorical questions, specific examples, and hints of sarcasm differentiate his argument from Bonesana's. In conclusion, style of writing and usage of specific literary techniques allow readers to believe that Levin has made the "better" argument.